The Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity is Made | Number of Trump Charges Reduced

Kicked back to lower court to determine as to what is official or unofficial acts. Cannot inquire as to a President's motive.

The Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity is Made

Snippet of Article: "... 6 to 3 vote. Applies equally to all Presidents. ...A federal grand jury indicted former President Donald J. Trump on four counts for conduct that occurred during his Presidency following the November 2020 election. The indictment alleged that after losing that election, Trump conspired to overturn it by spreading knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct the collecting, counting, and certi- fying of the election results. Trump moved to dismiss the indictment based on Presidential immunity, arguing that a President has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions performed within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities, and that the indict- ment’s allegations fell within the core of his official duties. The District Court denied Trump’s motion to dismiss, holding that former Presi- dents do not possess federal criminal immunity for any acts. The D. C. Circuit affirmed. Both the District Court and the D. C. Circuit de- clined to decide whether the indicted conduct involved official acts. Held: Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclu- sive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presump- tive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. Pp. 5–43. (a) This case is the first criminal prosecution in our Nation’s history of a former President for actions taken during his Presidency. Deter- mining whether and under what circumstances such a prosecution may proceed requires careful assessment of the scope of Presidential power under the Constitution. The nature of that power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office. At least with respect to the ...READ FULL OPINION"

Source: www.supremecourt.gov

Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity (July 1 2024), SCOTUS,Presidential Immunity and the Biden Document Scandal, Temporary presidential immunity is constitutionally required by Article II, TRUMP v. UNITED STATES

---

January 6 defendants might have had their jail sentences improperly enhanced

Justice Gorsuch Takes a Blowtorch to the Biden DOJ's Case Concerning J6 Prison Sentences

Snippet of Article: "During oral arguments, Justice Neil Gorsuch poked holes in the Biden Justice Department’s case, listing four instances of “obstructing a Congressional proceeding,” mentioning Rep. Jamaal Bowman’s (D-NY) fire alarm stunt last year: ..."Would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify?" Justice Neil Gorsuch asked. "Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?" ...a federal appeals court ruled that up to 100 January 6 defendants might have had their jail sentences improperly enhanced."

Source: townhall.com

Rep. Jamaal Bowman Actions vs. Jan. 6 Protests,

---

As 71-year-old 'Jan 6 Praying Grandma' Faces Prison, Trump Shares Support Calling Her 'One of Biden's Hostages'

Snippet of Article: "A federal jury delivered a guilty verdict against Rebecca Lavrenz, a 71-year-old Colorado woman...known on social media as the "J6 Praying Grandma," faced four misdemeanor charges, including entering and remaining in a restricted building, disorderly conduct, and parading or picketing in the Capitol. Lavrenz's arrest occurred on December 19, 2022, in Denver..."

Source: redstate.com

Biden's Hostages,Corrupt Jan. 6 Committee,Jan. 6 Protests,Democrat legacy, The Biden Years, Democrat Attacks on Whites, Democrat Attacks on Christians,Destruction of America (Biden Administration),

---

Government Corruption | Jan. 6 Democrat Investigation Hid Trump Request for National Guard Troops

January 6th Committee Hid Testimony Corroborating Trump Request for National Guard Troops

Snippet of Article: "...Former Rep. Liz Cheney’s January 6 Committee suppressed evidence that President Donald Trump pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the nation’s capital, a previously hidden transcript obtained by The Federalist shows. Cheney and her committee falsely claimed they had “no evidence” to support Trump officials’ claims the White House had communicated its desire for 10,000 National Guard troops. In fact, an early transcribed interview conducted by the committee included precisely that evidence from a key source. ..."

Source: redstate.com

Hiding the Truth, Government Corruption (Democrats),Jan. 6 Protests, Corrupt Jan. 6 Committee, Election Interference (Democrats),

---

Trump is Smart to Wait to File Civil Suits Against Those Making Insurrection False Statements Against Him

Did Trump commit insurrection on Jan. 6?

Snippet of Article: "...Trump himself faces 91 charges across four cases, two of which are related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. But insurrection is not among the charges, and he was acquitted [verdict of not guilty] by the Senate after the House impeached him on charges that included inciting an insurrection. ..."

Source: www.washingtonpost.com

Insurrection False Claims, Trump acquitted by the Senate for Insurrection, Jan. 6 Protests,

---